Legal Opinion

Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. Bell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1985No. 8415SC198Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure (1983). When a contract is in writing and free from ambiguity, such that no disputed facts exist, the intention of the parties becomes a question, of law for the court. Lane v. Scarborough, 284 N.C. 407, 200 S.E. 2d 622 (1973). If the writing leaves it uncertain as to the true agreement, however, what was meant by the parties may be made certain by parol evidence and the question is for the finder of fact. Cleland v. Children’s Home,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Henry S. Cram v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., Robert S. Wahab, Jr. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Kramer v. . OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API