Legal Opinion

Rouge v. Rouge

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided November 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Margaret Elizabeth Rouge against Gabriel Mark Rouge to recover damages for the alienation of her husband’s affections. Motion to vacate the attachment against property. Denied.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The plaintiff brings the action against the defendant for alienating the affections of her husband. The gravamen of the complaint is that, while plaintiff was living in the city of Geneva, Switzerland, with her husband, the defendant made unto the husband false and malicious statements of and concerning plaintiff, that she was not a good, true, faithful, and worthy wife, and that the defendant caused an action to be begun by the plaintiff’s husband against her in a court of competent jurisdiction in Switzerland aforesaid, for the purpose of procuring a judgment therein annulling and ending…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lazarus v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Burdick v. . FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. People, Ex Rel. Collins v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Allen v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. People Ex Rel. Pells v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. J. Newman Lumber Co. v. WempleNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API