Legal Opinion

Atterbury v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided February 3, 1961No. Motion No. M-5613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Del Gtorno, J.

This is a motion for an order permitting the late filing of a claim in accordance with the provisions of subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act.

This claim names the State as defendant. The defendant would seem to be the New York State Thruway Authority. At the hearing of the motion the parties stipulated for the record that the State would not raise this issue. They further agreed that the court should pass upon the facts as if the State were the proper defendant, and the State further stipulated that if the motion were granted that the State would consent to the substituting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941
  2. Guifre v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  3. Monahan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  4. Haney v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Stone v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Callanan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Jaycox v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API