Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Railway Co. v. . Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1916Published

1ConcurrenceAllen, J.

CLARK C. J., and HOKE, J. dissenting. a. Are there water powers, rights, and properties on the lands of the respondents as described in the petition capable of being developed for the production of electric power for use in connection with and in addition to the electric power already developed and in use by the respondent, Hendersonville Light and Power Company? Answer: "No."

b. Are there water powers, rights, or properties on the lands of the respondents as described in the petition which are being held by the respondent, Hendersonville Light and Power Company, to be used or to be developed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blue Ridge Interurban Railway Co. v. Hendersonville Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API