Legal Opinion
Pickrell v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 9, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Clay —
Affirming.
On June 14, 1914, William Wilson and H. C. Dunavent sold to Otis Pickrell and J. E. Zinsmeister the exclusive right to manufacture for a period of five years a sanitary milk strainer alleged to have been covered by a patent issued to Robert Lynch and purchased by them. The contract of sale provided for an annual minimum royalty, and in the month of October, 1915, Wilson and Dunavent brought an action against Pickrell and Zinsmeister to recover the minimum royalty due for the first year. The defenses were: (1) The contract was delivered on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cox's Admr. v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Downing's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Pickrell v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rowland's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Dwiggins v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Carrithers v. Jean'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- New York Canners, Incorporated v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Vincennes Bridge Company v. PoulosCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.