Legal Opinion

Moore v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1900PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Petition for habeas corpus. Before Judge Janes. Paulding county. August 24, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The grand jury of Paulding county returned an indictment against Moore, charging that, on a day named, he did in that county “unlawfully sell spirituous liquors, malt liquors, and other intoxicating liquors.” He entered a plea of guilty, and was sentenced. Subsequently he sued out a writ of habeas corpus, whereby he sought to be discharged from custody. In his application for the writ he alleged that the indictment was void, because based upon the act of September 5, 1883 (Acts of 1882-3, p. 570), prohibiting the sale of spirituous, malt, and other intoxicating liquors in the counties of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Ex parte BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Whitcomb's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  2. State Board of Medical Examiners v. FriedmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Reid v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Griffin v. EavesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API