Legal Opinion

In re Ryan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Per curiam

Ryan was by a justice of the peace of Saginaw county committed to the State house of correction, etc., at Ionia as a disorderly person, in default of finding sureties. He now applies for his discharge. The command by the justice was to detain Ryan until he should find sureties or be thence discharged by due course of law. The statute under which these proceedings were taken is chapter 53 of the Compiled Laws, which points out a way in which the person may be discharged. These proceedings are to be taken in the. county in which the person was tried, and contemplate his continual presence in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. GustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API