Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Huff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1895No. 6402PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This is an error proceeding from the district court of Lancaster county. It appears from the transcript filed with the petition in error that two actions were commenced in the court below by the plaintiffs in error as assignees of D. W. Haydoek, insolvent, to recover from the defendants therein, who are also defendants in error, on three promissory notes, bearing date of August 24, 1891, each for $1,407.78, due in three, six, and nine months, and bearing interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from date. Said causes were by order of the court consolidated for trial, and will, for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Helmer v. Commercial BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Buck v. Davenport Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. W. S. Bloom & Co. v. Warder, Mitchell & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Weitz v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leahy v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ayres v. WestNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lemmert v. Guthrie Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Peoria Manufacturing Co. v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API