Legal Opinion
Territory of Alaska v. First Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 19, 1930No. 6010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
An appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of dismissal at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, because, first, there is no evidence of death of Charles Clinton Rice; second, there is no evidence that he left no heir.
The plaintiff produced testimony that Charles Clinton Rice, during 1918, deposited in the defendant bank War Savings Certificates and United States Bonds of the value of $2,695; that no interest has been collected upon them; that the War Savings Stamps have long since matured; that the bank has not heard from Rice since’ the time the deposits were made; that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Huling v. Kaw Valley Railway & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Tyler v. Judges of Court of RegistrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Cunnius v. Reading School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Starr v. SchramDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1938
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933