Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Wood

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

A decision on the question of law presented by plaintiffs’ motion to strike certain affirmative defenses interposed by both defendants should await a resolution of the facts. The sufficiency of the affirmative defenses being dependent on a determination of the nature of the relationship existing between the parties, the defendants should not be deprived at the outset of the proceedings of the opportunity to develop the facts upon which their defenses are founded.

In disposing of a motion attacking affirmative defenses as insufficient on their face I must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. MacDonald v. AstorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. Verges v. News Syndicate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. Colton v. Wonder Drug Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lirtzman v. Spiegel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  2. Wohl v. Blair & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Shenandoah Life Insurance v. HawesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API