Legal Opinion

Browne v. Browne

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 1990No. 89-03290PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant, Patricia Browne, challenges an order on her motion to modify rehabilitative alimony and child support. We have examined the briefs and record and find merit in only one of the two issues she raises on appeal.

Ms. Browne correctly argues that the trial court erred in not making the increase in child support-retroactive to the date of her petition. At the hearing on Ms. Browne’s motion, her former husband, Ap-pellee Chad Browne, stipulated that the children’s financial needs had increased and that he had the ability to pay a larger amount of child…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meltzer v. MeltzerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Friedman v. FriedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Fotorny v. FotornyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Whitman v. WhitmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Snyder v. LinvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API