Hopkins v. Everett
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Barculo, Justice.
The counsel for the defendant is mistaken in supposing that a demurrer will not lie against a denial in an answer as well as to new matter. The word “same,” in section 153 of the Code, refers to the word “ answer,” and not to “ new matter.”
I think, also, that the answer is insufficient. The complaint alleges that defendant “ assaulted the plaintiff, and seized him by his collar and shook him violently.” The answer “ denies that he did assault the said plaintiff, and seize him by his collar, and shook him violently.” The defendant has grouped three of the charges and denied…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People ex rel. Gunst v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- McClave v. GibbThe Superior Court of New York City · 1895
- Clark v. DillonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
- McClave v. GibbThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
- Ketcham v. ZeregaNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1852