Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Dunlap

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Johnson county. Heard below before Broady, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

This case differs but in one respect from that of Cheney v. Janssen, ante p. 128.

Upon the trial, as appears by the bill of exceptions, it was admitted by the plaintiff that the notes and mortgage sued on are based upon an usurious loan of money, etc. The plaintiff offered “ in evidence the notes and mortgage sued on in this case. * * * Plaintiff offers in evidence the endorsement on the backs of the three notes, and makes it a special offer for the purpose of showing whether the signatures were recently made or not. Objected to as immaterial, irrelevant, and incompetent. Objection overruled.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tally v. CrossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Putnam v. Hamilton-Stoddard-McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API