Legal Opinion

Martin v. Piscataquis Savings Bank

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 11, 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELAHANTY, Justice.

James Martin, plaintiff below, brought an action against defendant Piscataquis Savings Bank (hereinafter the Bank) to recover a portion of the monies paid to the Bank in discharge of a mortgage. Essentially, plaintiff’s action challenged the right of the Bank to charge plaintiff for attorney’s fees incurred when the Bank obtained a writ of possession to oust plaintiff from the mortgage estate. Plaintiff paid the attorney’s fees under protest in order to consummate the discharge of the mortgage; his action followed to recover the disputed sum. The Superior Court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  2. Armijo v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In re the Estate HerleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. Whitcomb v. HarrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
  5. Gralynn Laundry, Inc. v. Virginia Bond & Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Maine Power Co. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Maine Turnpike Authority v. BrennanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API