Legal Opinion

Scolaro v. Marlatt

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 28, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINUSKIN, J.S.C.

Plaintiff moves after the statute of limitations has run to amend her complaint to include her husband’s claim for loss of consortium. Relief is sought pursuant to R. 4:9-3.1 Although the motion is made by plaintiff, the court will consider it as an application by her husband to assert a cause of action to be joined with her complaint.

Plaintiff, who sustained injuries in an automobile accident on August 31, 1981, filed suit on September 22, 1982. Her husband failed to join as a party plaintiff on his per quod cause of action. Prior to this motion and before the statute of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smelkinson v. Ethel & Mac Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Hoch v. Venture Enterprises, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Viviano v. CBS, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Tornquist v. PerkowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API