Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Beaton & Associates, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 1989No. 1-89-0336PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Plaintiffs, Thomas and Barbara Cummings, appeal from an order of the trial court that impounded the trial record and ordered the parties to refrain from discussing certain allegations found in the second amended complaint. Defendants are McDonald’s Corporation, private investigative agencies and their agents, and certain individuals who allegedly conspired to harass and intimidate a witness in related litigation and who allegedly committed other acts that “corruptly influenced the administration of justice.”

On this interlocutory appeal, plaintiffs assert that the order entered constitutes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Organization for a Better Austin v. KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. In Re a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Skolnick v. Altheimer & GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cummings v. Beaton & Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Allianz Insurance v. Guidant Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Northern Trust Co. v. BRENTWOOD NORTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. In re J.S.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API