Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Edrington

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 9, 1913No. 19,974PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application by David Schwartz and others for writs of certiorari and prohibition against Prentice B.. Edrington, Judge, to review an order sentencing relators for contempt in violating an injunction. Application dismissed.

1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, J.

Relators allege that, at the instance of certain persons, whom they name, the judge of the Twenty-Eighth judicial district court issued an injunction prohibiting them and the Jefferson Voice Publishing Company, Limited, from publishing the names of said persons, “as petitioners for incorporation of the village of Gretna in the parish of Jefferson, in the Jefferson Voice, a newspaper published in the parish of Jefferson, and from further publishing the names of said parties under the heading of the petition to incorporate the village of Gretna”; that the publication thus referred to “was made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Dailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Mackenzie v. Soden Mineral Springs Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Denis v. LeclercSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1811

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jaubert v. Crowley Post-Signal, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Fairfield v. American Photocopy Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Hamilton v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine Operators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Mulina v. Item Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API