Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.E.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 2001No. 10-00-297-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REX D. DAVIS, Chief Justice.

A jury recommended that Dionisio Castillo’s parental rights be terminated with respect to his three-year-old daughter M.E.C. The court rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict. Castillo claims in seven issues that: (1) there is no evidence and factually insufficient evidence that he knowingly placed or knowingly allowed M.E.C. to remain in conditions or surroundings which endangered her physical or emotional well-being; (2) there is no evidence or factually insufficient evidence that he had notice of the court’s temporary orders with which the jury…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Elloway v. Pate, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Danny Wayne Martin v. Amanda JoAnn Parris, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  3. Danny Wayne Martin v. Amanda JoAnn Parris, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  4. In Re MEC, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  5. Jennifer Osagiede, as Representative of the Estate of Sule Osagiede v. Lazaro Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API