Goldman v. Rubenstein
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Callaghan, J.:
The plaintiff and defendant each moves for judgment. The facts are not disputed. The defendant procured a purchaser for a drug store owned and conducted by the plaintiff and in connection therewith sold a lease which had five years to run. One acting as a broker for the sale of such a lease should be licensed, under the provisions of section 440-a of the Real Property Law, and no action can be maintained to collect commissions earned on such a sale unless the broker has first procured a license. (Real Prop. Law, § 442-a; Roman v. Lobe, 212 App. Div. 162.) This defendant was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Grow v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Sherley v. TrabueCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Long v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Snyder v. Pleasant Valley Finishing Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Warshor v. WarshorNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Handy v. CohenMount Vernon City Court · 2003