Legal Opinion

Tiger v. Peck

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1917No. 7770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, C.

On the 18th day of June, 1013, O. K. Peck filed a petition in the county court of Okmulgee county asking that the will of Winey Tiger be admitted to probate. Due notice of the hearing of the petition was given as required by the statute. On the 3d day of July, 1913, John Tiger, by his guardian ad litem, Thomas J. Parrar, filed objections to the probate of the will, alleging that the testator, Winey Tiger, did not have the mental capacity to make a will; that she was not of sound mind and disposing memory; that the will was not signed, executed, declared, or published as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In Re Estate of CullbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Harley v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Head v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Collins v. WestingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Free's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Kirk v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Miles v. FreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. RIVENBURG v. CILIBERTISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API