Legal Opinion

Solar Turbines Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Solar Turbines Incorporated (Solar) petitions for review of the orders of the Board of Finance and Revenue, dated January 24, 2001, which sustained the Department of Revenue’s determinations that Solar is not entitled to refunds of Utilities Gross Receipts Tax (Tax) 1 payments for the years 1997 and 1998. We affirm.

For purposes of this appeal, Solar and the Commonwealth entered into a stipulation of facts, (Solar’s Brief, Ex. A), which are summarized as follows. Solar, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caterpillar, Inc. (Caterpillar), is a world-wide designer and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Department of Environmental Resources v. Rushton Mining Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Hanley & Bird v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Eat'n Park Restaurants Business Trust v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Electric Power Service Corporation v. Commonwealth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. PECO Energy Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Ignatz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. PP& L, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Hvizdak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API