Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stevenson v. Goomar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 20, 1989Published

1Concurrence

Mikoll, J. (concurring).

In my view there is merit in defendant’s argument that the failure to charge him with medical malpractice in the statement of charges in the administrative proceeding under the circumstances presented here precludes a finding that the issue of medical malpractice was "fully aired” (see, Allied Chem. v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 72 NY2d 271, 277, cert denied — US —, 109 S Ct 785).

Claims of unprofessional conduct, moral unfitness, fraudulent practice of medicine and willful harassing, abusing or intimidating a patient were set forth against defendant with respect to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Allied Chemical v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rockaway Care Center v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Clayton v. DominguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API