Legal Opinion · Dissent

Florida Hurricane Protection & Awning, Inc. v. Pastina

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 2010No. 4D08-4641Published

1DissentTaylor, J.

I respectfully dissent. I would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari, because in affirming the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to the homeowner, the circuit court applied the correct law. Section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2008), mandates that contractual attorney’s fees provisions be deemed reciprocal obligations in any action to enforce the contract. The contract in this case contained a unilateral attorney’s fees provision for the contractor’s enforcement of the contract. By operation of the statute, this attorney’s fees provision was rendered reciprocal. Because the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Florida Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. LEE COUNTY ELEC. CO-OP., INC. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Landry v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Indemnity Ins. Co. v. ChambersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API