Harris v. Norton
New York Supreme Court
This was an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Gridley, J.
The complaint in this cause was filed to forclose a mortgage executed by Stephen Prouty and wife to the plaintiff, to secure the sum of four hundred and seventy-eight dollars and ninety-two cents, dated on the eleventh day of August, A. D. 1843, acknowledged the same day, and recorded on the seventeenth of the same month. The same persons executed a mortgage to the defendant John D. Norton on the same land, bearing date the tenth day of August, 1843, ac-' knowledged on the twelfth, and recorded on the fourteenth of August, 1843, for the sum of $1272,69. In 1847,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickerson v. TillinghastNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Seymour & Bouck v. Van SlyckNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Elsey v. MetcalfCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Schutt v. LargeNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Evertson v. EvertsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
3Cited by7 opinions
- MacAuley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Purdy v. . CoarNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Savery v. BrowningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Gooding v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
- Patten v. MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.