Kent v. State

Gary Kent appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, possession of cannabis, and tampering with physical evidence. We affirm Appellant’s conviction without comment as to the felon-in possession and tampering charges, and with reference to State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012), as to the cannabis charge, but reverse to correct minor errors in Appellant’s sentence.1

Appellant first argues that the oral sentence does not conform to the written sentence as to the amount of time served. Where the oral pronouncement and the written sentence do not agree,…