Legal Opinion
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 27, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00818Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: HAIR RELAXER MARKETING MDL No. 3060 SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Master Docket No. 23-cv-0818 Judge Mary M. Rowland MEMORANDUM OPINION AfND ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint.1 [432]. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss [432] is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background2 The factual allegations from the Consolidated Class Action Complaint ([185], “Class Action Complaint”)…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.