People v. Green
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Moreover, the evidence overwhelmingly established that defendant was a participant in a drug-selling operation and a possessor of contraband found in two apartments being used as drug factories.
Defendant has not established a violation of the principles of People v O’Rama (78 NY2d 270 [1991]) in connection with a note from the deliberating jury. Before deliberations began, defense counsel expressly agreed to permit the jury to examine the exhibits in evidence. In the note in question on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DunhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013