Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Schroering
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1976No. 75-1318PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
541 F.2d 523
Dr. Walter WOLFE and Dr. Phillip S. Crossen, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Edwin A. SCHROERING, Jr., Commonwealth Attorney for the 30th
Judicial District of Kentucky, Individually and as
representative of the Commonwealth
Attorneys for the 53 Judicial
Districts of Kentucky,
and
Ed W. Hancock, Attorney General of Kentucky, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 75-1318.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 16, 1975.
Decided Aug. 18, 1976.
Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., Carl T. Miller, Jr., Edwin A. Schroering, Jr., Frankfort, Ky., for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- John C. Greco v. Orange Memorial Hospital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Jane Doe, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Eric FriedlanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Zbaraz v. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985