Legal Opinion

Seneca Insurance v. Ruday Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 9, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the contentions of the defendants Ruday Realty *580Corp. and Crosstown Management Corp. (hereinafter together the appellants), vacatur and/or an increase of the subject mediation award is not warranted since the award did not violate a strong public policy, was not irrational, and did not manifestly exceed a specific, enumerated limitation on the mediator’s power (see Matter of Town of Callicoon [Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., Town of Callicoon Unit], 70 NY2d 907, 909 [1987]; see also Matter of Local 456, Intl. Bhd. of Teamsters v City of Yonkers, 75 AD3d 555 [2010]; Matter of Scher Law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Town of Callicoon & Civil Service Employees Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Balis v. Chubb Group of InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Scher Law Firm v. 87-10 51st Avenue Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API