Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1900Published

Action for an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

First. The amended supplemental complaint which was served in this action, pursuant to the authority given by the Special Term, and affirmed by the Appellate Division (44 App. Div. 253), contains an appropriate allegation as to the probate of the will, and that letters of administration with the will annexed, were duly granted to the defendant. The objection, therefore, which existed to the interlocutory judgment heretofore granted, was removed. See Moore v. Moore, 42 App. Div. 92. The complaint as it now stands avers in substance that at various times previous to the 13th day of April, 1895,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell v. . MerrifieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Hale v. . Omaha National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Barnes v. . QuigleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Wright v. . CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API