Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hudson v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2008No. 100466Published

1DissentJustice Kilbride

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal in Hudson I does not preclude plaintiffs from reinstating their willful and wanton claim. When a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a claim or a lawsuit without prejudice, the plaintiff may refile the claim without being barred by res judicata or the rule against claim-splitting.

In Rein, this court held that the plaintiffs’ common law claims that were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice in an earlier lawsuit were barred under the doctrine of res judicata because the plaintiffs were splitting their claims…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Flores v. DuganIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Dubina v. Mesirow Realty Development, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API