Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Sorensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1992No. 890145PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice.

We granted defendant’s petition for cer-tiorari to review a decision of the court of *775appeals that affirmed the trial court’s (1) valuation and distribution of defendant’s dental practice and (2) allocation of expert witness fees between plaintiff and defendant in this divorce action. Sorensen v. Sorensen, 769 P.2d 820 (Utah Ct.App.1989). We also granted plaintiff’s cross-petition in which she assails the court of appeals’ (1) reversal of the trial court’s award of attorney fees to her and (2) denial of attorney fees to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of HallWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. In Re Marriage of NicholsColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Frampton v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. May v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Anesthesiologists Associates of Ogden v. St. Benedict's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  4. Orlob v. Wasatch ManagementCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. Becker v. Perkins-BeckerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API