Legal Opinion
Hoar v. Prescott Park Arts
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided August 25, 1997No. CV-96-551-MPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Hoar v. Prescott Park Arts CV-96-551-M 08/25/97 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jonathan R. Hoar v. Civil No. 96-551-M Prescott Park Arts Festival, Inc. O R D E R Defendant, Prescott Park Arts Festival, Inc., ("Prescott Park"), moved to dismiss the Title VII action brought by plaintiff, pro se, Jonathan R. Hoar, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Prescott Park asserted that it was not an employer as defined under Title VII at 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e(b) because it lacked the requisite number of employees. Plaintiff objected but did not provide appropriate factual…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Laura L. OST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEST SUBURBAN TRAVELERS LIMOUSINE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Agnes VERA-LOZANO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Virginia THURBER, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. JACK REILLY'S, INC., D/B/A Jack's, Defendant, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.