Legal Opinion
Cardillo v. Moore-Handley, Inc. (In Re Cardillo)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided August 30, 1994No. 19-40230PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTESTED MATTER
ORDER ON MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
JAMES E. MASSEY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Frank and Susan Cardillo, the debtors in this Chapter 7 case, (the “Debtors”) move for an order holding a creditor, Moore-Handley, Inc. (“Moore”), in contempt and imposing sanctions for violating the automatic stay. Without this court’s approval, Moore garnished Mr. Cardillo’s wages shortly after obtaining an order determining that a debt owed to Moore by Mr. Cardillo was nondis-chargeable. The court has yet to grant or to deny a discharge to Mr. Cardillo under 11 U.S.C. § 727. The question presented is whether the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watson v. City National Bank (In Re Watson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re William L. Embry, Debtor. Boatmen's Bank of Tennessee v. William L. EmbryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Watson v. City National Bank (In Re Watson)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Miller v. Hulvey (In Re Hulvey)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. James W. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Parker v. Boston University (In Re Parker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Palm v. Klapperman (In Re Cady)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Mu'minUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Shaw v. Santos (In Re Santos)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.