Legal Opinion

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 96-523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. After reviewing both the record and the board’s report, we conclude that Dalrymple’s estate planning information was transmitted to respondent by a non-lawyer and that the non-lawyer set the initial fee before either the client or the non-lawyer consulted with respondent. The respondent entered into a relationship that allowed the client to perceive that the setting of a fee, the obtaining of information, and the possible refund of the fee- could be controlled by a non-lawyer. An attorney should avoid even the perception that his or her…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API