Legal Opinion
Roque v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 21, 1995No. 84182PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
664 So.2d 928 (1995)
Robert J. ROQUE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 84182.
Supreme Court of Florida.
September 21, 1995.
Rehearing Denied December 20, 1995.
Mark King Leban of the Law Offices of Mark King Leban, P.A., Miami, and Arturo Alvarez, Coral Gables, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for respondent.
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review State v. Roque, 640 So.2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), wherein the district court declared section 838.15, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), valid. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, §…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Locklin v. PridgeonSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- State v. DeLeoSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Cuda v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- OCEAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. THE JEWELRY CHANNELDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Pampa Beverages, LLC d/b/a Transnational Supply v. HussingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2024