Legal Opinion

State v. D'AMATO

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 17, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 N.J. Super. 185 (1953)

97 A.2d 741

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MATTHEW D'AMATO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 8, 1953.

Decided June 17, 1953.

Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and FRANCIS.

Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Solomon & Miller, attorneys).

Mr. Cecil T. Woolsey argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Frederick T. Law, Prosecutor and Mr. William A. O'Brien, Assistant Prosecutor, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, S.J.A.D. (temporarily…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BartellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. State v. DietzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. State v. CentalonzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. State v. PetroliaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. State v. BaileyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. State v. AndrialNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. State v. CorbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API