Legal Opinion
Andrews, Pusateri, Brandt, Shoemaker & Roberson, P.C. v. County of Niagara
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment based upon defendant’s alleged failure to pay for legal services rendered by plaintiffs. Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion seeking summary judgment on the complaint and dismissal of the counterclaims. With respect to the complaint, plaintiffs’ own submissions in support of the motion raise triable issues of fact whether defendant owes plaintiffs further compensation pursuant to the legal services contract, and whether plaintiffs performed services in addition to those…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Home Savings Bank v. Arthurkill AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ulrich v. Estate of ZdunkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Birt v. RatkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- Auburn Custom Millwork, Inc. v. Schmidt & Schmidt, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Micro-Link, LLC v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- AUBURN CUSTOM MILLWORK, INC. v. SCHMIDT & SCHMIDT, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Auburn Custom Millwork, Inc. v. Schmidt & Schmidt, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- MICRO-LINK, LLC v. TOWN OF AMHERSTAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.