Maine Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The consolidated petitions for review challenge FERC’s approval of a comprehensive settlement that redesigned New England’s capacity market. The Maine Public Utilities Commission and the Attorneys General of Connecticut and Massachusetts assert that FERC’s approval of the settlement was arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, and beyond the Commission’s jurisdiction. We reject most of these arguments, but we agree with the petitioners that the Commission has unlawfully deprived non-settling parties of their rights under the Federal Power Act.
I
In a “capacity” market — as opposed to a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maine Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010