Legal Opinion

Walker v. Franco

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner claims her eviction should be annulled because it was based on acts committed by her son, and her testimony that he moved out of her apartment six months before the hearing was not rebutted by respondent. Substantial evidence in the record, however, supports respondent’s determination to terminate petitioner’s tenancy on the ground of non-desirability (see, Matter of Woody v Franco, 260 AD2d 186, lv denied 94 NY2d 754). The record reveals the tenancy was terminated as a result of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woody v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Green v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Satterwhite v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Bond v. HousesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Brown v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Douglas v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API