Legal Opinion

Muir v. Miller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 11, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Van Burén District Court. — Hon. M. A. Eoberts, Judge. Garnishment proceedings, commenced as at law, and subsequently transferred to the equity docket. There was a hearing on the merits, and a decree, from which the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Eobinson, j.

In October, 1888, the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of S. J. Miller, deceased, recovered in the Yan Burén district court judgment against the defendant M. J. Miller for the sum of two thousand, two hundred and twenty-seven dollars and -twelve cents, with interest and costs. In July, 1891, a general execution was issued on the judgment, and the defendant Ellen L. Miller was garnished as a supposed debtor of the defendant M. J. Miller, and her answers were taken by a commissioner appointed by the court. The answers thus taken showed that M. J. Miller was the husband of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clapp v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Sprague, Warner & Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Muir v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. EichmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Crenshaw v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Mahaska County ex rel. School fund v. WhitselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. State Bank v. WolfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Williams Savings Bank v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API