Legal Opinion

People v. Mendenhall

California Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1902No. Crim. No. 658PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

The defendant was tried and convicted upon a charge of assault with intent to commit murder. His appeal is from the judgment, and the record before us consists of the judgment-roll alone, without any of the evidence given at the trial. The only errors assigned are upon rulings of the court in allowing and refusing instructions.

It is contended that the court erred in giving the following as a portion of its charge to the jury: “Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Such malice may be express or implied. It is express when there is manifested a deliberate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lamb v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. People v. TorresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. People v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. BurgleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ButtsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. State v. RogersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Quinn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. People v. QuimbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. People v. Del CerroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API