Legal Opinion

Tolleson v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1927No. 7 Div. 733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

If the defendant Tolleson had reasonable grounds for believing, and did believe that the plaintiff Jackson stole the rim and tire in question from the owner, or received it from a third person, knowing it had been stolen, and with no intention to return it to the owner, there existed probable cause for arresting Jackson, and the arrest was not unlawful, though made without a warrant; the theft in question being a felony. Section 3263, Code of 1923; Rich v. McInerny, 103 Ala. 345, 354, 15 So. 663, 49 Am. St. Rep. 32.

"It is the settled law of this state that the recent possession of stolen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Rich v. McInernySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Coats v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Buckles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Buckles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API