Legal Opinion

Krause v. Alper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 1957Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries (first cause of action) and by his father for medical expenses and loss of services (second cause of action), the court set aside, as inadequate, that part of the jury’s verdict which was in favor of the infant and granted a new trial, and let stand that part of the verdict which was in favor of the father. The appeal is from the judgment entered thereon in favor of the father. The infant, then about 11 years of age, was injured when he tripped over a wooden doorstop on appellants’ premises and fell. At that time he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Krause v. AlperNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API