Legal Opinion

Brown v. Conway

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Geaee, C. J.

The record does not disclose why the cause was transferred from the law to the equity side of the calendar. The demand for an accounting is not exclusively cognizable in equity. Originally, matters of account which were proper for an action of account were cognizable exclusively at law;' but the old common-law action of account was early assumed by courts of equity, and its jurisdiction may, as a general rule, ¿t-tach whenever the subject-matter cannot be fully investigated at law. It is the general rule that, in order that an' equity court may obtain jurisdiction of an accounting, three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Mayo v. HalleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Schoening v. SchwenkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Security Savings Bank v. PeddicordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benson v. Charles Weitz' SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Walling v. Iowa Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Warren County v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Benedict v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Warren County v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API