Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Ward

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 16, 2001No. 00-0458/MCPublished

1DissentSullivan, Judge

I disagree with this Court’s decision not to grant an abatement of appellant’s case, and accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

To justify denying the petition for reconsideration and abatement, the majority attempts to distinguish the facts of the case at bar from the facts of United States v. Kuskie, 11 MJ 253 (CMA 1981), and Berry v. Judges of the United States Army Court of Military Review, 37 MJ 158 (CMA 1993)— two cases in which our Court granted abate*392ments to appellants who died pending appellate review.1 The majority writes:

In Kuskie, the appellant died while his petition for review of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Randall Gendron v. United States of America, Randall Gendron v. United States of America, James P. Glass v. Rodney J. AhitowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Charles E. MoehlenkampCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. William DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Rick PaulineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API