Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moss v. Arnold

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1938No. A-9408Published

1DissentBarefoot, J.

I cannot concur in that part of the above opinion which seeks to go into and decide the validity of the information filed in this case. The only question, to my mind, here involved is whether or not a direct or indirect contempt was committed, and Avhether a writ of prohibition should be granted or denied to determine this question. From an examination of the briefs and the transcript of the evidence only in the contempt proceedings, I am of the opinion that if it should be found, as a matter of fact, that the petitioner committed the acts complained of, it would be a direct contempt and in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Evans v. Willis, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  4. Corley v. Adair County CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Jeter v. District Court of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API