Legal Opinion
Samuel Stores v. Queen City Credit Clothing Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.
Plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction enjoining and restraining the defendant from using the wording “ Queen City Credit Clothing Corporation,” or any colorable imitation thereof, as the trade or business name or slogan in connection with the conduct of its business.
The following facts are uncontradicted: In the year 1900 Morris Samuel and Rose Samuel, his wife, conducted a credit clothing business in the city of Buffalo, N. Y., under the assumed name of Queen City Credit Clothing Company. A certificate to that effect was filed in the offi.ce of the clerk of Erie county. Thereafter…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Fisher v. . Star Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Mail & Express Co. v. Parker Axles, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Stogop Realty Co. v. Marie Antoinette Hotel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- White Studio, Inc. v. DreyfoosNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. FerdinandNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1939
- Samuel Stores v. Queen City Credit Clothing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936