Legal Opinion
Page v. Ekbladh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 13, 1991No. 275PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge:
Raymond and Georgene Page, (the “Pages”) individually and as parents and natural guardians of Frank Page, appeal the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County granting defendant-appellee Dr. Lamar Ekbladh’s (“Ekbladh”) preliminary objections in the form of a motion to dismiss pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 5322(e). 1 We vacate the order entered by the trial court and remand for further proceedings.
The factual and procedural history of the case is as follows. On July 19, 1983, in Williamsburg, Virginia, Ekbladh, an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- in All Cases which have been Consolidated into this Proceeding by Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Petty v. Suburban General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Norman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jessop v. ACF INDUSTRIES, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Humes v. Eckerd Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Aerospace Finance Leasing, Inc. v. New Hampshire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Poley v. Delmarva Power and Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Scribner v. MacK TrucksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.