Legal Opinion
Lee v. City of Decatur
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 21, 1937No. 3 Div. 191PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The purpose of this litigation is to test the constitutionality of an act entitled “An act to appropriate the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars for the relief of the City of Decatur, Morgan County, Alabama,” approved September 2, 1935. Gen.Acts 1935, p. 745.
We consider the several grounds of attack in the order presented in the brief of the Attorney General on behalf of appellant.
The bill is challenged as violative of that provision of section 64 of the Constitution which reads: “ * * * • no amend- merit to bills by one house shall be concurred in by the other, unless a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- State Docks Commission v. State Ex Rel. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- State ex rel. Brown v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Nevada Mining Ass'n v. ErdoesNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Phillips v. D. & J. ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Smith v. Waterworks Board of City of CullmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Advisory Opinion to the SenateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.